Four camera style ugly use qc675 is outdated ,oppo and Xiaomi use qc730 ,not
Improvement at all 3 year compare each other
Sriki, 25 Sep 2019Worst design, no storage expansion, heavy to hold, one of the worst mobile from vivoIt has an SD card according to this article.
The best phone in this lineup has been the V11 Pro.
Vivo should use this as a base for further development.
Even with a SD660, I'd take a V11 Pro over a V15 or V17.
The newer ones would appeal to me only for the camera setup. Otherwise V11 Pro is much better all rounder.
Worst design, no storage expansion, heavy to hold, one of the worst mobile from vivo
Anonymous, 25 Sep 2019Because Redmi built quality is a mess.I am not sure what you are talking about. Jerryrig tested the K20 pro and it passed with flying colours. So build quality is pretty fine.
Could you elaborate a bit more on your source that Redmi phones are sub par to Vivo phones ?
It is said that it has but actually it doesn't have any micro SD card slot
Not Worth at all, it is totally money waste Phone Vivo V17 pro, it is not even pro in camera segment, Company used Sony IMX 582 sensor for camera in this huge price. What a Shame.
Dont buy at all this Vivo V17Pro.
You will definitely waste your money.
Rudy, 25 Sep 2019Are you sure it has a telephoto camera module?? Because here in Indonesia, it has a macro came... moreI just checked Vivo's India website. Apparently they use different rear camera configuration for different markets.
In India they use:
48mp main shooter + 8mp ultra wide + 13 mp 2x telephoto + 2mp depth camera.
But in Indonesia, they use:
48mp main shooter + 8mp ultra wide + 2mp depth sensor + (sadly) 2mp macro shooter.
In India this handset is more expensive than the Redmi K20 pro with a SD 855 chipset and far better OS support from MI. Don't know how many people will buy this overpriced device